Are we consistent? On assessing and communicating the regional avalanche danger level across forecasting centres in Europe
Christoph Mitterer
Avalanche Warning Service Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
Simon Legner
Technisches Büro Buchauer Markus (TBBM), Innsbruck, Austria
Norbert Lanzanasto
Avalanche Warning Service Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
Matthias Walcher
Avalanche Warning Service Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
Patrick Nairz
Avalanche Warning Service Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
Related authors
Karsten Müller, Frank Techel, and Christoph Mitterer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4503–4525, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4503-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4503-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the updated EAWS (European Avalanche Warning Services) Matrix, developed to support consistent avalanche danger assessments across Europe. It links snowpack stability, its frequency, and avalanche size to the five danger levels. Based on expert surveys and operational testing, the Matrix supports expert judgment and aligns with the Conceptual Model of Avalanche Hazard while addressing known ambiguities in practice.
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how avalanche forecasters across Europe used a new tool called the EAWS Matrix to assess avalanche danger levels. Despite different approaches, many services used the Matrix in similar ways. Our findings can help to further improve the Matrix and support more consistent avalanche forecasts, leading to more reliable and credible avalanche information for people in snow-covered mountain regions.
Jürg Schweizer, Christoph Mitterer, Benjamin Reuter, and Frank Techel
The Cryosphere, 15, 3293–3315, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow avalanches threaten people and infrastructure in snow-covered mountain regions. To mitigate the effects of avalanches, warnings are issued by public forecasting services. Presently, the five danger levels are described in qualitative terms. We aim to characterize the avalanche danger levels based on expert field observations of snow instability. Our findings contribute to an evidence-based description of danger levels and to improve consistency and accuracy of avalanche forecasts.
Karsten Müller, Frank Techel, and Christoph Mitterer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4503–4525, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4503-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4503-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the updated EAWS (European Avalanche Warning Services) Matrix, developed to support consistent avalanche danger assessments across Europe. It links snowpack stability, its frequency, and avalanche size to the five danger levels. Based on expert surveys and operational testing, the Matrix supports expert judgment and aligns with the Conceptual Model of Avalanche Hazard while addressing known ambiguities in practice.
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how avalanche forecasters across Europe used a new tool called the EAWS Matrix to assess avalanche danger levels. Despite different approaches, many services used the Matrix in similar ways. Our findings can help to further improve the Matrix and support more consistent avalanche forecasts, leading to more reliable and credible avalanche information for people in snow-covered mountain regions.
Jürg Schweizer, Christoph Mitterer, Benjamin Reuter, and Frank Techel
The Cryosphere, 15, 3293–3315, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3293-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Snow avalanches threaten people and infrastructure in snow-covered mountain regions. To mitigate the effects of avalanches, warnings are issued by public forecasting services. Presently, the five danger levels are described in qualitative terms. We aim to characterize the avalanche danger levels based on expert field observations of snow instability. Our findings contribute to an evidence-based description of danger levels and to improve consistency and accuracy of avalanche forecasts.